The Universe Theory - Part 3

Wellcome to the 3rd post of my universe theory. I should tell you that you need to read first ve second post before this one. I tried to explain why i developed a theory for universe and how it makes sense. After those two posts, you may think that my whole theory is based on mysticism. In this post, i will try to analyze how my theory is related to the phsical world. This one will require some level of physics knowledge but i will try to briefly explain some concepts.

Let me start with the summery of the first 2 posts. According to my theory, universe is made up of creations. Some of these creations are under our control. Devil tries to inflict some interference on our behaviors by manipulating creations. Thus we are responsible for our actions with our will. This cycle repeats on and on.

If you want to come up with a theory for universe, you need to be providing explanations for some well known concepts and realities in the science too. You need to be descriptive. Also, you would better have some test or results you propose. You need to be predictive. As for me, i don't have enough math knowledge at that kind of level but i can understand the Schrödinger's quantum mechanics and Einstein's general relativity. I can't propose a new mathematical framework in this post but i will try to give you a new perspective to apply. I will give you an insight that can be applied to mathematics. So i hope someone establishes equations after reading this post :)

Let's take a look at some physical phenomena. What my theory says about some proven some unproven concepts of the universe.

Multiverse

I have mentioned this one briefly in the last post. According to my theory, there is no multiverse. The same universe is realized and manifested again and again. This realization is the same as being created from scratch from our perspective. In other words, when you observe the universe moment by moment, there is no continuity among them. The universe would look like it is created from scracth every moment. Of course this coninuity is driven by universal laws. I have told you that universe is made up of creations. As long as these creations keep behaving the way they are supposed to behave, we percieve it at time and space. Einstein thinks each are one part of Spacetime.

There is a certain speed limit inside the universe. And that is the speed of light. Nothing inside the universe seems to be able to move faster than speed of light. You would need close to infinite energy to move something faster than light. I don't have a clue why this number exists and it is 299792458 meters per second. God wanted it so :) Of course you can derive speed of light from Maxwell equations. There are other constant values in the universe too. And combination of these values is called Fine Tuned Universe.

There are limits like maximum speed or minimum length or minimum time. They must be around 10 i guess. These values can be derived and tested. If the god had not created the universe with these constants, we may not be able to live in this universe. As a matter of fact, believers of god use these numbers and their harmony as an argument. You can remember the dice throwing example here. I too think that the god created the universe so that people can roam around but i can only explain it by logic, not physics. So let's get back to physics.

I have told you that the universe is being realized countlessly over and over again every second. This number is a little bit critical but i can't provide anything more than an opinion about it. There is a concept called the planck time. It is like 1 over 10 to the power of 44 or something. Nothing can happen faster than that in our universe. Maybe that is the frequency of our universe. I will talk about this frequency again in a minute.

Big Bang

Even though it is called "the big bang", nothing is bagning of blowing up. When scientist realize that the universe is expanding (we will talk about dark energy), they started believing that the universe was only a tiny dot at the beginning and started expanding to today's form. That rises strange questions. What is outside of the universe? What comes before the universe? These questions may be tied to god from a philosophical standpoint. But it looks impossible to answer from a physical standpoint. Because everything we know and we can do can only stay inside of this universe, we can't get out.

In other words, even if you have an idea of the workings of the universe, just like the coffee with milk example, you can't answer what was there before the universe and what is there outside of the universe? This is just simply impossible. From your beliefs' perspective, you can say there is no concept of before the universe because there is god and god has no before or after. I am inclined to believe that way. But it is more of a philosophical opinion. I am trying to say that the dimensions started there. Just a note here, i would say nothing in this universe is infinite including the universe itself, but i can't prove it :)

When we talk about the outside of the universe, i would say there are the higher dimensions. Considering that time and space are both illusions from our perspective, i would say there are other dimensions ruling in those realms but those dimensions can be inferred physically.

Of course i can't answer "why the universe has begun". I can't make a logical relation about it, i can only say the devil rebelled and we are tested against it. If i wanted to make a mathematical reason and result relation, i would need millions of times more mathematics knowledge than i have. But maybe i can say that the start of the universe is a result of some collision or interference of some higher dimensions. Beginning of the universe is one of the areas i can't go deeper. Neil Turok had a similar idea about this before me.

Time

When we are talking about the universe or its beginning, one of the first questions that comes up would be "what is time". When the universe created, the continuity that we precieve as time has started. We can reach to the higher dimensions by getting rid of the time dimension or perception. If we talk about time at the top level dimension, at god's level, we imply some sort of constraint or some starting. And that would be against the understanding of god. So i guess it is possible to have time dimension when we go deeper in the levels, maybe 7 levels. Or maybe we humans are the only creations that has time perception. I wonder if animals have time perception based on continuity like us.

We can think time as 1 part of spacetime. When the mass is increased in the universe, time slows down. But it doesn't mean the actual events, which are occured from the higher dimensions, are slowing down. It just that it takes more time for those events to reach us. It is like walking in a crowded street slowly. Those events need to interfere with lots of other creations or force to reach us.

Inside all of the universe, the concept of time is universe being refresed every second a many times. Just like watching a movie. The frames are shown one after another and we perceive it as continuity. As long as we are able to realize continuity, we percieve time. For example, our eyes are triggered on changes in the view. If you look at the same place for a long time, you may lose the view alltogether. This makes me think that maybe time is just entropy.

This is one of the vital questions of my theory. What is the frequency of the universe? I think this concept of time is as fast as planck time or faster. But since we may not be able to claim the higher dimensions have time on their own, our time may be even faster than the planck time constant and our universe is refreshed faster. This is sort of like a constraint that universe applies on us. You can't observe anything faster than the creator. In other words, you can's produce a frequency of like 10 to the power of 45. This is a bit of speculation.

We can't realize if time stops for a while. I don't think we would recognize if somehow a problem occurs in the higher dimensions (a glitch in matrix :P ) and if we get stuck in a stopped universe. The whole universe would go on by its own rules and we would continue commanding our brain and body like nothing happened.

I can even tell you something more exotic. We can't prove it if the whole universe has just begun a couple of minutes ago. All the knowledge in your brain can be explained by some neural structure. If i claim that everything you know has been imprinted into your brain a couple of minutes ago and time started a couple of minutes ago, no one can prove otherwise. This is one of the strange outcomes of my theory. Universe applies rules inside it and we are subjected to them by being trapped here. But the universe itself may be subjected to different rules.

Gravity and black holes

These two are undeniable concepts these days. The best model that explains these two are based on Einstein 's general relativity and it explains a lot successfully. But it can't make sense of what is in the center of the black holes or how gravity works at the smallest scales. Therefore there emerges some new theories. One of these is Loop Quantum Gravity. I will talk about it later.

We need to keep something in mind when looking from my theory 's perspective. We are witnessing some sort of a hologram in this universe. It is a reflection and we don't fully understand its basic properties. Some properties are lost from our perspective. Therefore, maybe you may need to add new variables into known equations. We already have some hidden variables in the quantum physics understandings. We can't experience those hidden variables but they inflict effect on our experience. I am on this side.

When we ask what is gravity, i guess it is mostly related to the Higgs Field. I am not sure if the higgs field is consisted of particles, but i am inclined to think that way. I was already inclined to think Loop Quantum Gravity is the way to go. Gravity is one of the hardest concepts to explain these days. Electromagnetism and nuclear forces can be easily explained. And me too, i don't have much information about gravity.

If you ask me, there would be a different form of matter inside the center of the black holes. Instead of going to infinity or opening up to another point in space, there could be a new form of matter that we don't know its hidden properties. We are unable to observe the matter inside a black hole (like in the Interstellar). Maybe it appears with new properties under that kind of pressure. You know diamond is converted from coal under pressure. This is all speculation though. But even the Einstein is adding some variables into his equations when necessary. Let's understand what it is in the next subtitle.

Dark energy and dark matter

There is a term called cosmological constant in Einstein's general relativity. The necessity of this number appears after Einstein comes up with the equation. Because they observe the universe is expanding and it is even accelerating. Therefore they end up adding a constant term into the equation. After that, it explains how the gravity work at big scales. They call dark energy as the energy that is expanding the universe. It just means an energy that we don't know what it is.

Also there is a weird outcome of this energy. The universe is expanding faster than the speed of light. Normally, nothing can move faster than the speed of light inside the universe. But appearantly, the universe is skipping this rule from the outside perspective. The farther points of the universe is getting farther away from us, faster than light. We will never see them since their light just can't overcome the universe and reach to us. But this is not all the weirdness in the universe. They discover something else.

Galaxies are moving ridiculously fast according to known gravity rules. There must be something that holds the galaxy together and prevent it from falling apart. Because the amount of matter inside some galaxies do not have enough mass for those speeds. Therefore they propose the Dark Matter as the matter that exists but we don't know what it is. I wanted you to know that there are some mysticism in the science before you judge me with mysticism :)

As for my theory, these two are realy easy to understand. Dark matter is only a matter but it interacts less. Dark energy is not an energy. It is rather more creations inside the universe that we can't observe. More creations means a bigger universe. This just like an aquarium. You add water and get more space everywhere. Even though dark evergy is expanding the universe, it is not thinning the universe. As i said, it is just more matter inside the universe. But why this expansion is speeding up? We can maybe speculate that some creations are created for humans in the universe. Our number is growing like exponantially :)

Holographical universe

The hologram technology is reflecting the properties of something to another surface. Just like a movie screen. I think our universe looks like this. There are certain reflections of certain things in the higher dimensions. That is why i think the mistake of the equations for quantum mechanics or gravity is missing this point of view. What do i mean:

These equations must be thought as going from the 4th to 3rd or 5th to 4th dimensions Or maybe some other level. Einstein thinks at 4 dimensions but it feels like it needed to be applied as deriving dimensions from 5 or higher. Some sort of dimensional reduction. Now i don't mean i am smarter than Einstein. There is already a theory called String theory, and it is interested in these dimensions. Some peope are trying to bring them together. I would say those two should get together with some form of dimension loss. You know when you see a movie on a screen is just 2D but it was actually 3D reality. This logic must be incorporated into these equations.

Quantum wave functions, quantum fluctuations, entanglement

I can say that i came up with my universe theory while thinking about these concepts. Quantum wave function is simply a probability function. A particle might look like it can be multiple locations at the same time but when observed, it appears only at 1 location for certain. There appears like reality is constructed when we make an observation. That is why we question how a normal universe emerges from this uncertain realm.

Quantum fluctuations means quantum particles popping in and out of existance in the void of space. They seem like they appear out of nowhere and dissappear. I don't think that is the issue here.

Quantum entanglement is like the billiard table i have mentioned in the first post. But let me give you another example for it here. Think about a pair of gloves. One for the left hand one for the right. You put them into two boxes and send one of them very far away. When the person on the other end opens their box and see it is the left hand, they immediately know that you have the right hand. Does that mean the information of the other glove reached you faster than light? Or does it mean you already knew 2 hands existed and no information is actually traveled. Scientists think this is faster than light instantaneous travel. But i guess it doesn't matter which one is correct view. They are both the same.

Now let me write my views on these concepts. When you look at the quantum wave functions, a particle must be in a non deterministic place in the space. Maybe it is a result of that creation itself doesn't even know what will it do or where will it end up? I mean isn't it possible for creations to be at some place or in some form after interaction with another field and we called that the devil field? If we incorporate some hidden varible in the higher dimensions into the scene, actually there is no uncertainty at all. I will also talk about Heisenberg principle. We can say there is a probability of particle being somewhere with the help of quantum functions. But we can't explain why this probability exists. Of course there are theories like Quantum Field Theory. But we don't even need them. Because the wave function is already collapsed before we make an observation. We can't observe faster than the universal frequency, therefore we can only observe the result.

If we continue with the same logic, thinking that the universe is just a result of interation in the higher dimensions, we can say nothing is coming in from non existance. Maybe we are just witnessing a 4 or 5 dimensional being passing by our universe? Saying it is coming in and out of existance just because we don't know how it behaves is short sided.

And lastly the quantum entanglement. I think the gloves analogy is right. We already know we have 2 gloves. Those two creations are already bound in the higher dimensions and we are just observing what they end up after the realization of the universe. So again, we are losing some properties of matter and thinking it is moving faster than light or something. Even if i don't make an observation, there is a pair of gloves. Both of them are creations. Both look like they could be either right or left at the same time but they are relized by the greater will and got some form in the end. My observation doesn't make the universe real.

Heisenberg uncertainty principle

According to this principle, you can't know the exact point and exact movement of a particle at the same time. So if you know where it is, you can't know where it is going and vise versa. I can also explain this by the particle having a property in the higher dimension and we can't know it because it is reduced. From the quantum perspective, it is just a creation that neither its position or movement is set exactly. From Heisenberg perspective, it is just lost information.

Super symmetry

This concept tells that every particle in the universe have their symmetric counterpart. Like an electron and a selectron. I belive this makes sense because most of the beings are created in double genders. This is mostly a speculation. But in quantum entanglement, there is a principle. If one particle is left, the other is always right and also vise versa. They are always opposite. This agrees with super symmetry logic. Everything is created with a correspanding pair in the universe. Only god is singular.

Loop quantum gravity

Since the equation of einstein can't make sense in the smallest scales, people try to come up with new theories for gravity. They have already thought a very similar idea to mine. They propose that everything inside the universe and the universe itself is made up of small quantizable elements. Thus they are trying to explain the hardest problem, the gravity, at the small scales. But unfortunately we can't make devices powerful enough to test their claims. But this view is like the basis of my theory. Someone needs to apply my logic into this theory and we need to think that their individual units are some reductioned creations from a higher dimension. I would need to study math for 1000 years for that kind of job :)

Some predictions

So here are some predictions of my theory. According to my theory, some hidden variables must be incorporated into the equations for gravity and quantum physics. There must be some sort of reduction while going from the higher dimension to lower dimension. In physics world, people usually don't like hidden variables.

According to my theory, locality and causality may not be preserved. What is locality? Every event can effect only the nearest particles around it. Can't skip particles. What is causality? Nothing can happen without a causal relationship. For example a ball can't just start rolling while standing. So according to my theory, we assume that there are lost informations in the higher dimensions and everything in this universe is just a reflection, therefore these two concept shall be violated.

I mean a ball can just start moving. Just because it is not doing that, doesn't mean it doesn't have that property. Or a supernova in the other part of the universe can instantaneously effect me. Far away events can instantly be affected by each other.

And even the universe doesn't have to give you any information about its next state. For example, if you drop a ball, it can just start going upwards while on the way down. Or a ball in your hand can just turn into a phone. A car can start going backwards at 100 kilometers per hour while it is going forward 100 kilometers per hour. Even though these make no sense to you, nothing has to provide any continuity in this universe. These are just clues to god's will and consistency. This is the claim of my theory.

As i have mentioned before, time is just an illusion. Even the time doesn't have to move at all. We need to get rid of this time perception in the higher dimensions but i don't know at which level. Nothing in this universe is uncertain. We just don't know what sets the states in the higher dimensions (coffee with milk).

Lastly, according to my theory, just like in Feynman diagrams, matter can change its form or state. Or maybe it is just changing place with another creation. This part is somewhat unimportant. An electron can just turn into a positron and a gamma radiation. This transition does not violate any rule in my theory.

How can it be disproven?

You can try to disprove my theory philosophically or we can have an argument over it. But if you want to somehow disprove it physically, you need to prove that the universe does have to follow some rules (without the presence of god or devil). Let's go back to the car example. If you can say if the car is going somewhere at 100 kilometers per hour, it has to be in the next this position at the next moment, otherwise the universe would fall apart, that might disprove my theory i guess.

When it comes to time, you may try to prove that time is emerging inside the universe and it is governed by universe and time doesn't exists outside of the universe. My understanding of time says that the universe is created again and again and we feel like it is time. If you can say the universe itself is creating time, you may seriously damage my theory.

You may also have one more argument. If you can prove that the universe is continuous and is not built by small particles, you would hurt my theory. You need to disprove Loop Quantum Gravity completely for this. If you are able to do these, you would probably already have your own model for universe.

Last deductions..

When i have learnt concepts like Block Universe and Pilot Wave Theory around 3 years back, i was also pondering on the concept of will. Thus, i came up with an idea to put the idea of a devil inside these theories. Remember Destartes asks, what happens if we are commanded by an evil demon. Inspired by these all, i came up with a theory that might explain universe, god and human triple in a sensible way. I should gear up for some final thoughts of mine at this point.

I think we are misinterperating the quantum physics. We believe that some event is finished by our observation. If you ask me, it is like quantum field theory in the higher dimensions, there are just interactions there and we are witnessing the results here. This probability is not a concept that is bound inside our universe. There are probabilities for creations in the higher dimensions. When we add a new dimension like the devil's dimension, we end up witnessing an already collapsed wave function.

I have mentioned some information is getting lost in the higher dimensions. This loss is like the derivation in the math. Also remember we have C constants in integral formulas. These types of numbers are actually the hidden variables. Even more so, derivative of 3X is just 3, so we have lost a whole X. It feels like there is some sort of dimensional reduction going on somewhere. That is why it looks like a hologram. There is another type of information out there, we are seeing the filtered version here.

I am looking for the answer for the universe in the higher dimensions instead of the lower dimensions. String theory also talks about 10 or 11 dimensions. But i am adding a devil's dimension with the other dimensions. Therefore concepts like will and responsibility and consciousness are making a bit of sense.

The frequency of the universe is important here. You know we lose information if we can't make frequent observations enough. Sometimes the wheels of a car look like they are going back while it is moving forward. This is a concept that need to be taken into account physically.

And the future..?

I have done my part :) I have presented you a model for the universe and more. I have explained it with a philosophical view. I have also mentioned how my theory can come together with the known physical phenomena in the universe. At this point, i have nothing more i can do other than asking some curious scientist to apply my logic into the physics mathematically. For one sentence of summary: I am basically talking about reduction of dimensions and dimensional interactions.

You can look at my theory just from a physical perspective. I mean i am not just diving into mysticism. Or you can discuss it philosophically. I hope i could open you a new window here. I would like to see your comments and questions about it. I would also ask you to share my blog post to make it heard more. See you at the next post :)


Leave a comment